Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 628 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#23435 09/10/07 08:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
J
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
Hansen has just released what is said to be the source code for their temperature analysis. The release was announced in a shall-we-say ungracious email to his email distribution list and a link is now present at the NASA webpage.

.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
It absolutely boggles the mind that people would actually call the science behind GW "peer reviewed".

This is the first time Hanson has EVER released the code for how he adjusts temperature data before making global average numbers. If the process has never been released, how on earth does somebody review it? I'm guessing Hanson's boss finally made him release it, after the recent error that Steve McIntyre found. "Peer review" didn't catch that 0.15 degree shift upwards in 2000, now did it?

I'm not holding my breath on waiting for the Hadley Institute to release their adjustment methodology, or even the raw data they use.

This doesn't just go against the peer review process - it goes against the scientific method!

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
J
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
"'Peer review' didn't catch that 0.15 degree shift upwards in 2000, now did it?"

Actually, it did. Steve caught it 6 years later though. smile

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 203
Originally Posted By: John M Reynolds
"'Peer review' didn't catch that 0.15 degree shift upwards in 2000, now did it?"

Actually, it did. Steve caught it 6 years later though. smile


True enough smile
I do hope Steve publishes a paper out of all this work - it would make good reading for anybody


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5