Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 378 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,696
M
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
M
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,696
Dean Falk, a world-renowned paleoneurologist led international team in brain analysis of ancient hominid.
Concluded that the so-called Hobbit was actually a new species closely related to Homo sapiens.

"We have answered the people who contend that the Hobbit is a microcephalic," Falk said.
The debate stemmed from the fact that archaeologists had found sophisticated tools and evidence of a fire near the remains of the 3-foot-tall adult female with a brain roughly one-third the size of a contemporary human.
"People refused to believe that someone with that small of a brain could make the tools. How could it be a sophisticated new species?"
Researchers compared 3-D, computer-generated reconstructions of nine microcephalic modern human brains and 10 normal modern human brains. Comparison of two areas in the frontal lobe, the temporal lobe and the back of the brain show the Hobbit brain is nothing like a microcephalic's and is advanced in a way that is different from living humans. Hobbit has a highly evolved brain," she said. "It didn't get bigger, it got rewired and reorganized.
Hobbit's brain is unique, which is consistent with its attribution to a new species.

It's time to move on to other important questions, Falk said, namely the origin of this species that co-existed at the same time that Homo sapiens was presumed to be the Earth's sole human inhabitant.
"It's the $64,000 question: Where did it come from?" she said. "Who did it descend from, who are its relatives, and what does it say about human evolution? That's the real excitement about this discovery."


Contact: Dean Falk
dfalk@fsu.edu
Florida State University (Public release date 29-Jan-2007


.

.
"You will never find a real Human being - Even in a mirror." ....Mike Kremer.


.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,031
T
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,031
Nice one Mike. I've always thought it highly likely to be a new species. Creatures on islands are usually smaller than their mainland relations. Means more individuals can survive on the fewer resources, therefore less chance of dying out through inbreeding. Of course they don't conciously become smaller. It's simply that if they don't they suffer the consequences. Besides I understood there were several found, unlikely to be a population of micro-cephalic individuals.

Humans on Flores go back a long way. They had plenty of time to become smaller. They presumably evolved from some sort of Homo erectus.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5