Theoretical Physics differs from all other sciences in a general way. All sciences have simple elementary principles, which combine into the complex reality. The complexity decreases when the abstraction level increases. In other words the basic of sciences is simple. The complexity increases enormously when the basic elementary factors combine into reality.
Theoretical Physics differs in a certain extent. When we analyze physical phenomena the observed is a combination of (many) different elementary phenomena. When we observe a simple stone this object is very complex. The building blocks of the rock are atoms. These atoms are much less complex than the stone. Analyzing the atoms we find electrons, protons and neutrons. Again there is simplification when the abstraction level increases. When we study the (sub) atomic world of the electron, proton and neutron suddenly, according to theoretical physics, the complexity suddenly increases exponential.
In theory everything is possible. Physical scientists use this argument when questions are asked why the outcome of QM is so complex. The sudden increase in complexity of physics contradicts all other sciences where things are more simple, more elementary when the abstraction level is increased. Theoretical Physics differs in this perspective from all other sciences.
The observation of the sudden increase in complexity is not consistent with other sciences. This is by itself not proof that the theory is false. We however have to ask: why? It can be that the complexity really increases suddenly but it is also possible that mistakes have been made. The SRT assumes time and space are relative. This theory increases the complexity of reality enormously. All the incredible paradoxes SRT implies are clear examples of this. The answer of science is that our senses cannot comprehend reality beyond our senses and that there is absolutely no reason to assume something is wrong with the theory.
The ordinary human mind is not trained to analyze phenomena that contradict our senses, because our senses are not equipped for understanding sub-atomic processes. We have to analyze the problems detached of our senses and therefore only mathematically solutions should be involved. Commonsense has no meaning in Theoretical Physics!
This can be true, but what if the theory contains errors? In that case we still can find statistically extreme high correlations. When the omissions are systematic in the end the search for the "best" mathematical solution will provide an answer that compensates for the omission. The derived mathematical solutions are than not even close in describing reality.
Theoretical physicists want us to believe that the scientific truth is more fantastic than any know fairytale! This unbelievable truth made me wonder whether the Standard Model incorporates mistakes that obscure the reality behind the math.
The SRT assumes that electromagnetic waves propagate through space without medium. When that is the case the relativity of time and space is a simple mathematical outcome determined by the assumptions or axioms on which SRT is based.
One of Einstein's axioms concerning SRT is that dragged ether does not exist. The ether in absolute rest is eliminated as a possibility by the famous experiment of Michelson and Morley. Dragged ether is denied by science only because scientists can not imagine dragged ether in conjunction with stellar aberration. It appears that dragged ether explains exact the stellar aberration of any star any time during the year.
The rejection of dragged ether by science in the beginning of the 20th century was premature. The SRT, after 100 years, only offers not more than possible explanation. The exact prediction of stellar aberration of any star any time by the formula of the article "Stellar Aberration and the Unjustified Denial of Ether" is very strong experimental prove dragged ether exists.
www.paradox-paradigm.nl/van_der_Togt_stellarab-final.pdf When dragged ether is denied unjustified the relativity of time and space are omissions incorporated in the Standard Model. Apart from this mistake there is for sure at least one other error incorporated in the Standard Model. QM concluded, even before Einstein discovered relativity, that the total mass of the electron could not totally be explained with the electromagnetic properties of the electron. It appears however that QM violates the energy conservation law while deriving this conclusion.
www.paradox-paradigm.nl/Van_der_Togt_equiv2ckw.pdf After correction of the violation the QM-mass of the electron is completely electromagnetic!
The assumption of QM that apart from the electromagnetic mass there also has to be a mechanical mass is false. The above-mentioned omissions have severe consequences for the physical perspectives the QM-math (Standard Model) offers.
You still may wonder how it is possible for QM to produce excellent mathematical solutions when there are severe omissions incorporated. In theory there are in principle infinite solutions for any observed data. This automatically implies that the preferred mathematical solution compensates for incorporated systematic omissions. Math never presents the exact physical processes. Math is by definition always an approximation of reality and never presents reality itself.
Normally when scientists observe contradictions they search until they find the reason and make adjustments. When the theory itself, the SRT, is false than the search for the truth becomes impossible, because Theoretical Physics declared the SRT as the undeniable truth and therefore all the observed contradictions SRT implies become by definition paradoxes: apparent but not real contradictions.
Science and physic journals reject the articles that handle the omissions with the argument that they are not topical; not relevant. How can omissions that shaped science so profoundly ever be not topical! Journals and physicists ignore the omissions after they have been discovered and by doing so they practice incompetent science. The reason for ignoring or denying the omissions is understandable when scientists during their education, and later during their career, are convinced in the truth they studied. It is very embarrassing for (top) scientists, who concocted the Standard Model, to admit they have been mistaken.
In the book "From Paradox to Paradigm"
(
www.paradox-paradigm.nl) I explain how with ether physical phenomena like electron, proton, neutron, photon, synchrotron radiation, time dilation, nuclear force, gravity etc. can be explained by only two forms of energy; electrostatic and magnetic energy. The accompanying math is relatively simple (high school level). The essential parts of the book are the arguments. The only purpose of the math is to verify whether the thoughts are consistent with experiments.
The reason for being very persistent in getting an article published about ether is that according to physics with dragged ether thermal nuclear fusion is a dead end. The ether indicates an approach opposite to thermal fusion. Because ether is denied by science it is impossible to do empirical research on nuclear fusion based on the existence of ether. The environmental situation on Earth is fragile. Many decades more of abuse by modern society may be disastrous. When dragged ether is acknowledged by science funds for research may be granted.
Convincing scientists to pay attention to ether has been fruitless. After more than 6 years they still refuse to address the omissions. The only way to change their mind and behave professional seems to be public opinion. Scientists can ignore individuals and maintain the status quo for ever, but when the public starts asking questions they cannot ignore them anymore. Read "From Paradox to Paradigm"
www.paradox-paradigm.nl and ask me any question. When you understand the simple elementary physics of ether and wonder why scientists ignore dragged ether you ask them yourself.
Carel van der Togt
