Originally posted by Uncle Al:
Uncle Al stands corrected. You don't have a problem. You have an insurmountable error. You are wrong. Physical reality is causal.
Little's proposal is wholly consistent with physics. Whether obtained polymers are (high temp) supercons or not merely requires observation of examples. Nothing you have posted could possibly be true.
BTW, diamond is not a blackbody emitter. 1000 C diamond does not glow: It is still well below its Debye temperature (at least 1500 C). The phase is NOT diamond. So it has nothing to do with diamond's black body properties at all. By the way diamond's Debye temperature is about 1800 C. What you see between the diamond's surface and the anode is a black cylinder of length up to 20 microns and even 135 microns) with a diameter of about 1 micron. It consists totally of entangled bi-electron waves. If you open the gap by too much and break tht phase, the residue gets sucked back slowly into the anode and/or the diamond.
To generate such a phase between Earth and Mars is probably impossible; but to generate it on a processor chip so that you have superluminal signal transfer without heat generation is possible.
If nothing I have posted could possibly be true, are you willing to bet your reputation on it and come clean when it is proved to be correct within the next two years? How much of your reputation are you willing to put on the line? All?
I agree with you on one point and that is that Physical Reality is causal; however, by sending a superluminal signal through a matter-phase does not violate causality. It only happens when you send such a signal through space. An entangled matter-wave occupies space and is stationary relative to its proper inertial reference frame; it is not space-time itself.
