sam
I just checked and all three of my links are clickable and
will cause your ( or at least my ) web browser to browse to the
page that the link is designed to browse to using a web browser.
however , I cant click on your links , would you mind leaving
out the peripheral addiditions and subtractions of your links
so that the links you posted will work with a web browser?
If your point is that we should better manage our GHGs,
to moderate the large feedback warming that water vapor contributes,
then I'd agree.
It is the very large 'absorption peak' (longwave) of CO2, which contributes to the greenhouse effect.
my point is that the heat from the incoming IR
( my focus begins here )
(
the 1/3 you don't focus on)
that is blocked or absorbed by the CO2 is causing
LESS SURFACE HEATwhich causes
LESS SURFACE ABSORBTIONwhich equates to
LESS SURFACE RADIATION your focus begins herewhich causes
LESS HEAT ABSORBTION IN THE ATMOSPHEREwhich results in
LESS WATER VAPOR
please excuse the rant like text behavior
the above would also lessen the 2/3 you focus on.
because the 2/3 is a result of the 1/3
without the 1/3 there wouldn't be a 2/3
which will also lessen your very large 'absorption peak' (longwave) of CO2, which contributes to the greenhouse effect.
shouldn't we be saying that the man made GHGs are contributing
to the natural greenhouse effect that has been in place long
before man could strike a match or even knew what fire was.