Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use. So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.
Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere
(NaturalNews) Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community *and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.
As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.
The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming.
Quote:
Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2 According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper atmosphere.
* because the media only reports what science says
so , if CO2 is only a reflector then that explains why the thermal imagery in the below video did not pick up any absorbed heat inside the cylinder being filled with CO2 from the heat of the candle.
if CO2 absorbed heat then the CO2 in the cylinder should have been heated up by the heat from the candle. but the CO2 did not heat up.
the heat is all reflected away from the camera and is not absorbed by the CO2 , otherwise there would be an increasing glow that would appear on the screen as the CO2 heated up.
the thermal imaging camera would have picked up any heat in the CO2 , and it didn't.
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
