Originally Posted By: ImagingGeek
:sigh:

It isn't a worm. A science-reporting site should do better. Calling it a worm is akin to calling a fire a star...

Bryan


But that's just it; a media site.
Used to put scientific studies into a format that can be noticed and digested by the masses.

In all fairness to the article, the creature in question was originally described as a worm, it looks like a worm, and 9/10 people won't care what name is given to any discovery in a media site's articles. Now if the nomenclature was off in a peer reviewed article...

Looks like little baby tremors worms. Can't remember what Bacon called them.

Laziness breeds innovation