Any 'nothing' that can host a law
or a deity or anything else,
either concrete or abstract,
is not absolutely nothing.
In brief: Any 'nothing' is not absolutely nothing.
So.
1
Can any 'nothing' be not ‘absolutely nothing’?
For example:
‘ Ideal gas’, ‘ Kirchhoff black body’, Minkowski (-4D)
and ‘Minkowski light cone’,
etc . . . and . . .
2
And can ‘ something’ (!) be ‘absolutely nothing’?
For example:
‘Quark’, ‘String theory’, .’Black hole’, (!) . .’CERN’ (!) . .
. . . . etc . . and . .
3.
And many years ago Aristotle wrote:
‘The Nature is afraid of Nothingness’.
And now some people think that ‘ Nothingness’
is not exactly ‘nothing’.
And now the Quantum theory agrees with Aristotle.
And so, maybe, Aristotle was right separating the knowledge
of Nature on two parts: Physics and Metaphysics.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
===================.
