Originally Posted By: ImagingGeek
2 minutes in it found three papers which dated the Atlantic floor using four other methods - Samarium-neodymium, Rubidium-strontium, Uranium-Lead and even Uranium-thorium of the area closest to the ridge itself.


You claimed you had already these links/papers.

Were you just lying?

Is it too hard to provide the links you claimed you had?

And the one link you did provide states:

Approximately 75% of the gabbros accreted within error of the predicted seafloor magnetic age, whereas ~25% are significantly older. These anomalously old samples suggest...

So fully one quarter of the dates were ANOMALOUS.

Is that what you call collaborating evidence? Hmmmmm?

Last edited by preearth; 06/04/10 12:39 PM.
Earth formed from a collision
www.preearth.net

Plate-tectonics is wrong
www.preearth.net/plate.html