Surely you mean "debunking the reality that physics suggests."

The physics itself works fine as an explanatory and predictive tool to utilize and relate to the material universe.

The models and metaphors that physics uses to describe the material universe leave a lot to be desired, and so are fairly easily "debunked;" but these are semantic problems, not problems with the material, results-based science.

If our brains understood concepts in a different way--and had the language to express that--we might be able to understand what the physics shows us, in a way that wasn't so easily "debunked."

I think the question should be about debunking the idea that we can easily understand reality, not that physics is misleading and may need debunking.
IMHO

Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.