I had a look through the articles ..... just have to love the quote below ....
Fellow report author John Church said he had long been suspicious about the historical data because it did not match results from computer models of the world's climate and oceans.
"We've realigned the observations and as a result the models agree with the observations much better than previously," said Church, a senior research scientist with the climate centre.
I'm speechless.
Reading further ... it appears that 'the prime source of error' is the depth at which the measurements are taken. Really ? Apparently the depth of the probe is calculated by making assumptions 'about how fast it descends through the water'. With all the other fancy measurements on the probe, you would have thought they could have included a pressure gauge !!! Now they are using a 'mathematical formula' to correct the error. Anyone smell anything fishy here ??
Even more speechless.
