Quote:
and any time you burn something you are creating co2;


picture in your mind ... a container , with a bottle of compressed gas and a bottle of compressed air inside the container.

now picture a remote ingition system outside the container that creates a spark to ignite the mixture.

the container is a sealed container that will not allow the co2 to escape.

the gas would all burn up and the co2 would still be in the container , right?

of course it would.

all you need is the air pumped into the container to burn the melted plastic.

dont forget to remove the excess heat through a exchange
system to prevent the pressure build up that would overcome the stress limits of the container.

if the opperation does not require that much electricity from the heat generated then you could exchange the excess heat into the ocean itself through heat transfer.

the plasma arc is arcing inside the container to remove the
toxic material.


Quote:
i doubt that you could capture the co2 and do something useful with it,


well if you cant figure out anything usefull to do with it or a way to profit from it , then perhaps the raw plastic you have recycled will cover the storage of the co2.

I wouldnt sudgest that you in particular try this or anyone else as you (big fat pig) dont understand heat and pressures according to your denial of heat being generated by friction.

so please study your physics and focus on the math , leave the theory behind where it belongs.




Last edited by paul; 04/26/08 03:22 PM.

3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.