Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums

Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.

The Forums
General Science Talk Not-Quite-Science Climate Change Discussion Physics Forum Science Fiction

Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Not-Quite-Science Forum Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion

Top Posters(30 Days)

Print Thread

Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion #15828 11/02/06 11:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 4,136 Seattle, WA D DA Morgan Megastar
DA Morgan Megastar D Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 4,136 Seattle, WA	A scientist is one whose practice corresponds with the scientific method. Thus John BaumGardner is not a scientist. He is a theist that earned a degree in science. There is a difference and it is very significant. DA Morgan

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	soilguy	11/02/06 09:47 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	TheFallibleFiend	11/02/06 10:28 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	DA Morgan	11/02/06 11:21 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	TheFallibleFiend	11/02/06 11:56 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	soilguy	11/03/06 12:30 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/03/06 12:32 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	terrytnewzealand	11/03/06 01:21 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	samwik	11/03/06 01:33 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	Blacknad	11/04/06 06:41 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	Blacknad	11/04/06 06:57 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	samwik	11/04/06 08:05 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	samwik	11/04/06 09:03 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/04/06 09:23 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/04/06 09:34 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/04/06 09:54 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	samwik	11/04/06 09:55 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	DA Morgan	11/04/06 09:59 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	TheFallibleFiend	11/05/06 12:52 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/05/06 04:45 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	RicS	11/05/06 08:14 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	terrytnewzealand	11/05/06 09:13 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	eternauta	11/05/06 09:16 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	samwik	11/05/06 10:01 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	Blacknad	11/05/06 10:17 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	trilobyte	11/05/06 01:32 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	DA Morgan	11/05/06 08:43 PM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	eternauta	11/06/06 01:06 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	DA Morgan	11/06/06 01:35 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	RicS	11/06/06 02:39 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	terrytnewzealand	11/06/06 07:54 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	RicS	11/06/06 11:27 AM
Re: Why AiG has no place in a scientific discussion	terrytnewzealand	11/07/06 02:11 AM

Moderated by Amaranth Rose II, Kate, Mike Kremer, RacerGT

Link Copied to Clipboard

Newest Members

debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users

Sponsor

Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group