This may surprise your RicS but when you wrote:
"Another useless thread that is NOT science.
Economic analysis of what might happen is a bit like saying that a third world war will cost 3% of annual world economic input."

I agree with you completely. I had a rather devious point in posting it ... and it relates to dehammer trying to claim that a link to the Hoover Institute, was relevant to climatology.

Look at his responses, above, he clearly does not see the difference. Glad someone else here can discern the difference between science and opinion.

DA Morgan