Originally posted by DA Morgan:
dehammer wrote:
"another news story from the global warming alarmist bbc. what do you expect from them, ballanced reporting?"
You mean like that provided by Fox News? Of course not. Had you read the story you might have found the following:
"According to BBC business correspondent Hugh Pym, the report will carry weight because Sir Nicholas, a former World Bank economist, is seen as a neutral figure."
The BBC is a news organization: They carried the story. That they carried it does not discount the fact that the report was writen by someone considered neutral by many.
so you consider someone neutral if they start with the theory that global warming exist except they dont consider it a theory, but a stated proven fact? how is that neutral?
if he had been neutral, then the article would have gone something like "IF global warming exist, it might do this, but it would depend on the surverity." Instead the article stated that it would most definately happen, and it might be this bad.
you see, I actually had read it. But once again, they just ran another story with the primese that global warming had already been proven as a fact. As i stated, its another news story written by a global warming alarmist published by someone who is not willing to look at both possiblities, because the other possibility will not sell subscritions.