Microbes Survive 50 Kilometers Inside The Earth

Until now, scientists thought that only specially adapted organisms they call extremophiles could exist in seemingly intolerable environments such as high-pressure, high-temperature oceanic hydrothermal vents or in the ice sheets of Antarctica. A study published in the February 22, 2002, issue of Science, however, shows that even common bacteria are viable under high-pressure conditions equivalent to about 50 kilometers beneath the Earth’s crust or 160 kilometers in a hypothetical sea. This finding may expand the habitable zone for life within the solar system and it opens new doors for looking for life much deeper inside planetary bodies than previously considered. According to Dr. Anurag Sharma the lead author, “It is exciting to observe the microbes under such unusual environments. Their continued biological activity says a lot about their resilience.” The scientific team is headed by Sharma and James Scott at the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. They adapted the tools of high-pressure physics to microbiology by using diamond anvil cells to subject two bacteria species–E. coli commonly found in the human gut, and the metal reducing Shewanella oneidensis–to pressures up to 16 thousand times the pressure found at sea level. “This is a very high-pressure condition for biology. Since liquid water turns into a solid high-pressure ice even at room temperature, these conditions are typically considered inhospitable,” says Sharma.

Both E. coli and Shewanella use formate in their metabolic processes in the absence of oxygen. With molecular spectroscopy, the Carnegie team measured the microbes’ use of formate to determine their metabolic rates. Optical observations on stained bacteria further confirmed their viability and found that they can survive pressures far beyond those of deep ocean trenches and in the deep crust. The techniques developed by Sharma and Scott will open the door for the “real time” examination of pressure and temperature effects on microbial communities. According to Scott, “One of the fundamental questions that needs to be asked now is whether the response exhibited by the bacteria is due to adaptation or selection. Our results raise important questions about the impact of pressure on the evolution of life and the study has tremendous impact on understanding a number of processes that are due to phase shifts caused by environmental conditions, such as the use of methane hydrates by microorganisms.” Scott continues, “This is what happens when two scientists with very diverse backgrounds get together and test the validity of past assumptions.” Sharma is an experimental geochemist and Scott is a microbiologist. Both are also members of the Carnegie Lead Team of the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI), which provided support for this work. The NAI was designed by NASA to encourage and stimulate such interdisciplinary collaborations.

The study suggests that as far as pressure goes, the subduction zones on Earth and deep water/ice structures, such as those found on the moons Europa, Callisto, and Ganymede, might be environments that could harbor life. “Understanding how microbes survive deep subsurface environments expands our ability to define and examine potential habitable niches beyond Earth,” commented NAI Associate Director, Dr. Rose Grymes. The techniques being developed at the Geophysical Laboratory will be used to test various hypotheses on the viability and probability of life in different environments, even before any NASA missions for the search for life are planned. For some time there has been mounting evidence that a large portion, if not a majority, of life today exists in the deep subsurface (including in deep frozen lakes and the ice caps on Earth). This along with other recent findings should be taken into account when focusing on the survivability of life elsewhere. “Soon the only thing that should limit our investigation of the survivability of life on Earth and beyond is our imagination,” concludes Scott.

Comments are closed.

4 Count Case GE ProLine 2 Bulb 120V T12 Electronic Fluorescent Light Ballasts picture

4 Count Case GE ProLine 2 Bulb 120V T12 Electronic Fluorescent Light Ballasts

$49.99



Sylvania Quicktronic Pro Series Ballast QHE 2X59T8/UNV ISN-SC picture

Sylvania Quicktronic Pro Series Ballast QHE 2X59T8/UNV ISN-SC

$10.00



Philips ADVANCE AmbiStar RELB-2S40-N Replacement Ballast 40-Watt 2-Lamp T12 picture

Philips ADVANCE AmbiStar RELB-2S40-N Replacement Ballast 40-Watt 2-Lamp T12

$18.79



EnergyPro 2 Lamp T8 Rapid Start Electronic Ballast Model SLE-232-120-LPF picture

EnergyPro 2 Lamp T8 Rapid Start Electronic Ballast Model SLE-232-120-LPF

$8.39



NEW Lutron ECO-T832-277-3 Electronic Fluorescent Dimming Ballast - 277V 3-32W T8 picture

NEW Lutron ECO-T832-277-3 Electronic Fluorescent Dimming Ballast - 277V 3-32W T8

$43.99



GE 2 Lamp Electronic Ballast Residential Grade T12 - 3 or 4 Foot - Case of 4 picture

GE 2 Lamp Electronic Ballast Residential Grade T12 - 3 or 4 Foot - Case of 4

$41.95



10 t8 ballast 4 lamp Ledvance LHE 4x32T8 Universal 120/277v picture

10 t8 ballast 4 lamp Ledvance LHE 4x32T8 Universal 120/277v

$60.00



KTEB-432RIS-1-TP-SL 4 Lamp F32T8 120V Electronic Ballast picture

KTEB-432RIS-1-TP-SL 4 Lamp F32T8 120V Electronic Ballast

$22.75



3 or 4 Lamp Electronic Ballast For Fluorescent Lamps - PHILIPS-ICN4P32N-10 picture

3 or 4 Lamp Electronic Ballast For Fluorescent Lamps - PHILIPS-ICN4P32N-10

$132.67



10-Count GE Fluorescent Ballast, GE432-MVPS-L Electronic T8, 120v to 277v picture

10-Count GE Fluorescent Ballast, GE432-MVPS-L Electronic T8, 120v to 277v

$108.99



Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes