Re: That was science
Posted by mara on Feb 08, 2002 at 11:28
(170.115.180.227)Re: That was science (Dale)
re:it is 'wrong' when the point under discussion 'should be' obvious.
you derive from a particular background of knowledge and experience. you seem to assume that what your knowledge and experience suggests is accurate in all contexts.
i disagree.i don't mind disagreeing, and i do disagree when you indicate that something is 'wrong', when in my opinion, it is not necessarily wrong, only a point of disagreement.
one of your traits may be to 'set them straigt', one of my traits is to specify that just because one tells another they are wrong may be a disagreement rather than a value judgement of correctness.
i got your point.
did you get mine ?
Follow Ups:
- Re: That was science Dale 09/2 10:32 (8)
- Re: That was science mara 12/2 12:45 (2)
- Re: That was science Dale 12/2 18:16 (1)
- Re: That was science Shasta 14/2 19:12 (0)
- Re: That was science Amaranth Rose 10/2 03:21 (4)
- Re: That was science Dale 10/2 11:54 (3)
- Re: That was science Amaranth Rose 10/2 16:10 (2)
- GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Dale 11/2 07:59 (1)
- Re: GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Shasta 14/2 19:09 (0)