I ain't competent ..

Posted by
Eudaemonic Pie on Jan 24, 2002 at 14:13
pppa56-resalecarsoncity1-1r7409.dialinx.net (

Re: quantum gravity detected!? (bobbapink)

And you know I ain't competent, Bobba, ain't competent to do no dad-gummed review of inconsistencies between general media reporting and findings in original research, and that's because I'm too dad-gummed dumb to understand even general media reports in the first place, no less re-analyze and re-interpret the original data. But, here's my question Bobba, just for you, and I ain't being adversarial, but open, because I'm coldfused now, I'm down with confirming quantum versus continuous behaviors, that's cool, and I agree that the actual observations are stunning, that's cool too but I'm wondering aloud, and I'm asking you if you'd please care to guess at the prepublication larger context of uncertainties about relating this data to gravity, unpublished standard uncertainties stemming from the way the data was collected. Again, Bobba, I ain't competent to re-analyze no stinking original QM data and make my own specific quantitative projections from it (doh!), so my credibility is all shot to hell (and my wife made me sleep on the couch with the dog last night too, so go gentle on me), so let's have a beer, and have you please "jump" on this one and give it a crack! Be bold! Grab you thrusters, man, and take a leap! from this observation to gravity? with what prepublication uncertainties?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup



[ Forum ] [ New Message ]