Re: CANS
Posted by anyman on Jun 26, 2002 at 23:53
(61.183.178.122)

Re: CANS (paul)

thanx, paul

i saw this item too, or one very similar...

these people do not understand the intent of the framers of the constitution...or the concept of separation of church and state

i predict that the ruling will be reversed (and rightly so) as did the article i read

but then, i am not a prophet

we shall see

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: CANS Mike Kremer 27/6 02:40 (6)
  • Re: CANS Amaranth Rose 27/6 03:52 (5)
    • Re: The Pledge of Allegience should stay the way it is.. Ben 27/6 16:04 (4)
      • pleasant surprise... anyman 27/6 22:26 (0)
      • Re: The Pledge of Allegience should stay the way it is.. Amaranth Rose 27/6 19:55 (2)
        • Re: The Pledge of Allegience should stay the way it is.. Ben 27/6 23:11 (1)
          • Re: The Pledge of Allegience should stay the way it is.. Amaranth Rose 28/6 05:51 (0)
• Re: CANS I. S. 27/6 01:41 (9)
  • Re: CANS anyman 27/6 09:01 (8)
    • About the religion of the Founding Fathers I. S. 29/6 00:19 (3)
      • Re: About the religion of the Founding Fathers anyman 29/6 15:45 (0)
      • Re: About the religion of the Founding Fathers DA Morgan 29/6 15:27 (0)
      • Re: About the religion of the Founding Fathers Amaranth Rose 29/6 11:13 (0)
    • Re: CANS I. S. 27/6 09:13 (3)
      • your joshin'...right anyman 27/6 11:05 (2)
        • Re: your joshin'...right I. S. 27/6 11:13 (1)
          • Re: yer joshin'...right anyman 27/6 11:18 (0)

---

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:

---

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]