Re: the answer is no
Posted by DA Morgan on Jun 17, 2002 at 12:43
(156.74.250.7)Re: the answer is no (Southern Man)
I have no doubt that a difference in output of the sun of 1/100th of 1% would be significant: Perhaps less. But what I consider is not of much relevance.
We know, for example, that the eruption of the Mt. Pinatubo volcano affected global climate in a measurable way. Factor that in and see what comes out. It certainly did not absorb or reflect 10% of the sun's energy. 1%? Not hardly. So the value to produce measurable affect is quite a bit smaller. How much smaller I don't know.
Follow Ups:
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 18/6 08:10 (12)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 18/6 16:00 (11)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 19/6 08:47 (10)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 19/6 12:59 (9)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 20/6 07:37 (8)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 20/6 11:30 (7)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 26/6 07:54 (6)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 27/6 12:33 (5)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 28/6 08:06 (4)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 01/7 13:24 (3)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 02/7 08:33 (2)
- Re: the answer is no DA Morgan 03/7 12:13 (1)
- Re: the answer is no Southern Man 04/7 09:48 (0)