Re: Corrected copy

Posted by Bobba on Jun 14, 2002 at 14:57

Re: You're right - I don't think much of the study (DA Morgan)

Your attempts at evasion are impressive.

If by evasion you mean clarification, I'd agree.

I didn't ask for anyone else sliding scale of "sufficient" ... I asked for yours.

And i gave it to you. I said, "I'm sure there are lots and lots." How is that evasive?

Can YOU point to one that satisfies your definition?

Probably could if I tried. Would you like me too?

I am assuming by the fact that you have now bobbed, weaved, hidden, and evaded that the answer is no.

See what happens when you assume.

That you have taken it upon yourself to criticize every single study pointed to by anyone...

What can I say Dan. You seem to have a talent like no other for linking to junkscience. Probably has something to do with your taste in hyperbole, hysteria and exaggeration.

Öand can't find a single study whose result warrant or merit a change in policy. That is impressive. And not in the way I would expect you would wish.

See above.

I was at least expecting you to take the easy out and point to the unambiguous studies that clearly demonstrate the harm caused by asbestos mining in Montana and you couldn't even come up with that one.

Didnít read it. Post it and Iíll consider it.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup



[ Forum ] [ New Message ]