bringin' it to the top...
Posted by anyman on Jun 10, 2002 at 07:49
(61.183.176.84)from this thread far below
Noah: Make That Ark BiggerPosted by DA Morgan on May 08, 2002 at 13:08
Well it looks like old Noah's Ark is getting more and more cramped.How about a one ton bird? And you need two of them.
For more information on what to feed it click here
~~~~~~~
noah: just follow the original plan, dude...
Posted by anyman on May 08, 2002 at 20:18
Re: Noah: Make That Ark Bigger (DA Morgan)
...and everything is gonna be alright
point 1
don't need the full grown adult version...a much smaller juvenile pair with sexual reproductive potential is plenty adequatepoint 2
if these were interfertile with any other species or genus (as is many times the case, once again showing that there is no working definition of species), then there would be no need for additional room at all...more on space below :-)just need the original baramin that had the potential for this sub-variety of creature
not only did noah not need more space, but he was probably able to fit all of the required creatures in less than HALF the space alloted...leaving pleanty of room for food, fodder, and a reasonably comfortable suite area for the his own human family :-)
but you welcome to try again...c'mon :-)
~~~~~~~
Re: noah: just follow the original plan, dude...
Posted by DA Morgan on May 09, 2002 at 13:54
Re: noah: just follow the original plan, dude... (anyman)Perhaps you can explain how its remains managed to get from Turkey to North America?
Did Noah have a C130 cargo plane?
Or did he just put it on a Northwest Airlines 747?
While you are at it don't forget to explain how the apatosaurus, trex, and the rest got here too.
I'm especially interested in how the flightless birds got to the islands in the Pacific. By parachute?
~~~~~~~~~Perhaps you can explain how its remains managed to get from Turkey to North America?
Did Noah have a C130 cargo plane?
Or did he just put it on a Northwest Airlines 747?
perhaps it went extinct before the flood
maybe it went before the breakup of **pangea** was complete (which likely occurred at some point either during or shortly after the flood)...this suggestion is not very likely however possible
maybe there was a land bridge from siberia to north america and they just walked across :-)
maybe they were originally flyers and lost the ability via mutation (more below)
While you are at it don't forget to explain how the apatosaurus, trex, and the rest got here too
probably via land bridge (see above)...some of those guys were big that they might even have waded across :-)
maybe they were transported by floodwater and deposited (which would admittedly not be able to account for any tracks they left behind :-)
I'm especially interested in how the flightless birds got to the islands in the Pacific. By parachute?
some of the islands may have been part of pangea (eg australia)
some may have rafted to the islands on mats of flora
some probably flew there...like some insects etc, some of the flightless birds were once able to fly...they lost the ability via mutation and isolation and genetic drift etc...once again pointing to a LOSS of genetic information via mutation, which is again no help for darwin and fans that desperately need some mechanism(s) that will account for any net increase in highly specific complex genetic information :-)
btw – from the article came this gem...
“This is a one ton plant-eating carnivore with really bizarre claws,”
maybe he meant herbivore or even omnivore...sounds like something george w would say, eh :-)
maybe someday i’ll have time to get to some of the other nonsense you posted below...too busy preparing, administering, grading, compiling final grades, and taking exams for the next few weeks :-)
in the meantime, you can keep the grins coming...please...thanx :-)