Re: attractive to what?
Posted by Amaranth Rose on Apr 15, 2002 at 08:43
(65.172.150.113)Re: attractive to what? (bobbapink)
Maybe it's a really, REALLY cute little patch of darkness!
Perhaps we're confusing the absence of a force with the presumption of an opposite force? I don't think that the absence of red implies the presence of "anti-red".
You might want to find and read the essay on "dark-suckers" that is out on the web somewhere. It sort of deals with this kind of idea. And it's wildly funny!
Follow Ups:
- Re: attractive to what? Andy™ 15/4 13:08 (0)
- Re: attractive to what? Son of Spam 15/4 09:31 (0)
- Re: attractive to what? Son of Spam 15/4 09:02 (0)