Re: harsh critisism required

Posted by Dogrock on Apr 09, 2002 at 21:37
(159.134.216.194)

Re: harsh critisism required (y)

I can't say I understand this, due to my lack of knowledge of random theory or the like, I'd have thought the randomness of decaying particles would be enough. But the 'second similar device' immediately struck me as a problem because it would have the same flaw as the first. It sounds a daunting (dare I say impossible) task to make something completely random and still have control over it.

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]