Home   |   News    |   Discussions   |   Books   |   Curiosities
Search
Custom Search
Popular Reads

Earthquakes and animal behavior
LHC may produce time travelling particles
Country boys boast bigger junk
Running the numbers on alien life
Uh-oh, placebo
Forgetful? Blame your house
Pill to blame for rise in prostate cancer?
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Carbon monoxide keeps city dwellers happy
Magnetic field alters moral judgments
Stars manufacturing organic matter?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill
Men 2% funnier than women
Parasite rewires sexual attraction
Novel psychiatric drugs take aim at gut bacteria
Discussions
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Sponsored Links
Browse

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Curiosities
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2012 2011 2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive


12 January 2012
Milky Way has "billions" of habitable planets
by Will Parker

Working with data from telescopes located around the world, an international team of astronomers have shown that planets around stars are the rule rather than the exception and that there are likely billions of planets in our galaxy where humans could live.

Reporting their findings in Nature, the team say that most of the Milky Way's 100 billion stars have planets that are very similar to the Earth-like planets in our own solar system (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars), while planets like Jupiter and Saturn are relatively rare. "On average, there are 1.6 planets in the area around the stars that corresponds to the area between Venus and Saturn," explained team member Uffe Gråe Jørgensen, from the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.

The new findings are important, as while new exoplanets are constantly being discovered, a much more basic question remains: how commonplace are planets in the Milky Way?

Most exoplanets have been found either by detecting the effect of the gravitational pull of the planet on its host star or by observing the planet as it passes in front of its star and slightly dims it. Both of these techniques are most sensitive to planets that are either massive or close to their stars.

The new work used a different method known as gravitational microlensing, which can detect planets over a much wider range of mass and orbital variables. In microlensing, exoplanets are detected by the way that the gravitational field of their host stars acts like a lens, magnifying the light of a background star. If the star that acts as a lens has a planet in orbit around it, the planet can make a detectable contribution to the brightening effect on the background star. Microlensing has the potential to detect exoplanets that could never be found any other way but it does require a very rare alignment of the lensing star and the background star to be seen.

This means that finding a planet by microlensing is not easy, in the six year's worth of microlensing data used in the analysis, only three exoplanets were actually detected: a super-Earth, and planets with masses comparable to Neptune and Jupiter. But by microlensing standards, this is an impressive haul. In detecting three planets, either the astronomers were astonishingly lucky, or, planets are so abundant in the Milky Way that it was inevitable.

Combining data from the three positive exoplanet detections with seven additional detections from earlier work (as well as the huge numbers of non-detections in the six year's worth of data), the team calculated that one-in-six of the stars studied hosts a planet of similar mass to Jupiter, half have Neptune-mass planets and two-thirds have super-Earths.

The survey was sensitive to planets between 75 million kilometers and 1.5 billion kilometers from their stars (in our solar system this range would include all the planets from Venus to Saturn) and with masses ranging from five times the Earth up to ten times Jupiter. The results strongly suggest that the average number of planets around a star is greater than one. "[The calculations] show that out of the Milky Way's 100 billion stars, there are about 10 billion stars with planets in the habitable zone. This means that there may be billions of habitable planets in the Milky Way," explained Jørgensen.

"We used to think that the Earth might be unique in our galaxy. But now it seems that there are literally billions of planets with masses similar to Earth orbiting stars in the Milky Way," added team member Daniel Kubas, from the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris.

Related:
Discuss this article in our forum
Springtime on Earth II
Running the numbers on alien life
SETI needs to see the light, say astrophysicists

Source: European Southern Observatory, University of Copenhagen


Social

Follow Science a GoGo


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.