Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


23 July 2008
Two Bees? Aw, Not Two Bees...
by Kate Melville

The cause of the widespread decline in pollinating bee populations has still not been explained, but new research published in the journal PLoS ONE has revealed an alarmingly rapid spread of disease from commercial bees to their wild pollinating cousins. Researchers Michael Otterstatter and James Thomson, from the University of Toronto, provide evidence that commercially produced bumble bees used in greenhouses are infecting their wild cousins, and that this is likely contributing to reductions in the natural pollinating bee population.

Otterstatter and Thomson investigated the occurrence of the highly contagious pathogen Crithidia bombi in wild bumble bees in southern Ontario, particularly in areas close to industrial greenhouse operations. In addition, the authors used a combination of laboratory experiments and mathematical modeling to simulate the spread of disease from commercial bees to wild populations, and to predict the extent and severity of such spread.

The researchers found that commercial bumble bees are often infected with C. bombi, and that these bees regularly escape from greenhouses and interact with wild bees. Near greenhouses, the rates of infection were startling: up to one-half of wild bumble bees were infected with C. bombi, whereas no bees harbored this pathogen at sites away from greenhouses.

Tellingly, the frequency and severity of infections declined with increasing distance from greenhouses, suggesting that these agricultural operations are foci of disease for wild pollinators.

The mathematical model that Otterstatter and Thomson developed confirmed that pathogen spillover from commercial bees would allow the disease to invade wild pollinator populations near greenhouses. The model predicts that, although disease may build up slowly at first, given sufficient time, spillover will result in a large-scale epidemic among wild bees.

The researchers flag their concerns that the commercial bumble bee industry is expanding worldwide and the abundance of disease in commercial bees may pose a substantial threat to wild bee pollinators. The authors suggest that improved management of domestic bees through greater attention to their diseases and their overlap with wild species, would greatly reduce, or even eliminate, pathogen spillover.

Related:
Bee Boffins Abuzz With Theories About Honeybee Decline
Cell Phones To Blame For Deserted Bee Colonies?
Pesticide Suspected In Case Of AWOL Honeybees

Source: Public Library of Science


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.