Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
Why is our blood red
by janelee
0 seconds ago
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Today at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Today at 08:10 PM
a serious question to the forum
by paul
Today at 07:22 PM
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Revlgking
Today at 11:45 AM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


26 July 2007
When A Bad Fit Improves Accuracy
by Kate Melville

Molecular "computations" are essential for the survival of all organisms. To work, the molecules must pinpoint and then bind to specific counterparts while swimming in a thick, erratic molecular stew - a bit like finding a friend in a busy subway station during rush hour.

In the traditional view of molecular recognition, the binding molecules fit each other like a lock and key, but research has shown that in numerous cases, the molecules need to deform in order to bind, as the "key" is not an exact fit for the molecular "lock". Biologists have long puzzled over why evolution chose such an inexact system.

Now, however, Dr. Tsvi Tlusty and Yonatan Savir, of the Weizmann Institute, may have found the answer. A simple biophysical model they developed indicates that in picking out the target molecule from a crowd of look-alikes, the recognizer has an advantage if it is slightly off-target. This may appear counterintuitive: why search for a key that does not match its lock exactly, and then require that the imperfect key warp its shape to fit the lock?

But the researchers' model shows that the key's deformation actually helps in discerning the right target. Although the energy required to deform the molecular key slightly lowers the probability of its binding to the right target, it also reduces the probability that it will bind to a wrong one by quite a bit. Thus, the quality of recognition - i.e. the ratio of the right to wrong binding probabilities - increases.

This simple mechanism - known as "conformational proofreading" - may explain the observed deformations in many biological recognition systems. Furthermore, conformational proofreading may turn out be a crucial factor affecting the evolution of biological systems, say the researchers.

Related Articles:
Biochemical "Noise" Critical For Regulating Biological Processes
Designed By Mother Nature
Prof Questions Darwinian Dogma

Source: Weizmann Institute of Science



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.