Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


2 October 2006
Black Holes A Cosmic Contraceptive?
by Kate Melville

Astronomers from Yale and Leiden University in The Netherlands have discovered that old stars dominated many large galaxies in the early universe, raising the issue of why these galaxies progressed into galactic adulthood so early on in the life of the universe.

Cosmologists know that every year, only a handful of new stars are born out of the gas that fills the spaces in galaxies like the Milky Way. So, to account for the large number of stars in the universe today (around 400 billion in the Milky Way alone) it was thought that the stellar birth rate must have been much higher in the past.

But in this new research, appearing in the Astrophysical Journal, astronomers using the Gemini telescope in Chile reported that many of the largest galaxies in the universe had a very low stellar birth rate, even when the universe was only about 20 percent of its present age. The study was conducted using Gemini's Near Infrared Spectrograph, which analyzed the light of distant galaxies simultaneously over many different wavelengths. The researchers studied 20 galaxies so distant that their light had been traveling for nearly 11 billion years, or 80 percent of the age of the universe.

"The unexpected finding is what was not found - ionized hydrogen, the tell-tale signature of star birth. Remarkably, for nine of the twenty galaxies that we observed, this signature is not seen at all," said researcher Pieter van Dokkum. "It gives a firm limit on the stellar birth rate in these objects."

"Our new results imply that the stars in many large galaxies were born when the universe was in its infancy, in the first few billion years after the big bang," added research leader Mariska Kriek. "The results confirm what some astronomers had suspected - galaxies seem to have some method of birth control that is very effective."

The new study adds weight to the idea that in big galaxies, the formation of new stars was significantly suppressed after an initial period of very vigorous activity. "These galaxies had a very violent early youth, but rose into stable adulthood well before many galaxies like the Milky Way were even in kindergarten," explained Kriek.

One possibility behind the low birth rate is that enormous black holes in the centers of large galaxies may be responsible for suppressing star formation. It's speculated that the huge amounts of energy released from a black hole may dilute interstellar gas sufficiently to prevent future star birth. "Evidence for the presence of these black holes is seen in several of the galaxies studied, lending support to the idea that black holes serve as cosmic contraceptives," said van Dokkum.

Source: Yale University


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.