Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
a serious question to the forum
by Zephir
0 seconds ago
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Kyra M
Today at 02:47 AM
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


15 August 2006
Star Formation Theories Set For Significant Revision
by Kate Melville

The star AE Aurigae, embedded in a region of space containing smoke-like filaments of carbon-rich dust grains. Such dust might be hiding deuterium and stymieing astronomers' efforts to study star and galaxy formation. Observations from NASA's Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) satellite indicate that far more deuterium ("heavy" hydrogen) remains in our Milky Way galaxy than expected, a finding that could radically alter existing theories about star and galaxy formation.

Scientists believe deuterium was created a few instants after the Big Bang, and has been slowly destroyed over the eons as it is burnt in stars and converted to heavier elements. But it seems that these theories of deuterium's demise may be incorrect.

Writing in the Astrophysical Journal, the FUSE team's new large deuterium survey not only poses new questions about how stars and galaxies are made, but also solves a 35-year-old mystery concerning deuterium's uneven distribution in the Milky Way galaxy. "For more than three decades, we have struggled to understand and explain the widely varying levels of deuterium," said FUSE principal investigator, Warren Moos, from Johns Hopkins University. "Though the answer we have found may be unsettling to some, it represents a major step forward in our understanding of chemical evolution."

The deuterium saga starts back in the 1970s, when astronomers noticed that it was not as evenly spread throughout space as other elements. "FUSE was built to attack the deuterium problem," according to William P. Blair, FUSE's chief of observatory operations. "It is very gratifying to see this long-anticipated result, and it will surely be a legacy of the FUSE mission."

Blair explained that FUSE's sensitivity: "has allowed many more deuterium measurements, and for stars at greater distances from the sun." It is these numerous, distant observations that were crucial in confirming that there does appear to be more deuterium in some other parts of the Milky Way than there is close to our sun. And the pattern of deuterium variations FUSE found strongly supports Princeton University's Bruce Draine's theory that predicts how heavy hydrogen might behave in interstellar space.

Draine developed computer models that showed how deuterium might bind more readily than light hydrogen to interstellar dust grains, changing from an easily detectable gaseous form to an unobservable solid. These models suggested that in places like the neighborhood of the sun, relatively undisturbed for eons, a significant amount of deuterium may have disappeared from view in this way. In other areas, disturbed by supernova blasts or nearby hot stars, dust grains would have vaporized, releasing deuterium atoms back into a detectable gaseous form.

In fact, FUSE found deuterium levels of about 15 parts-per-million measured in our neighborhood and even lower - as low as 5 parts-per-million - elsewhere. But FUSE also found concentrations as high as 23 parts-per-million in regions where supernovae or hot stars have occurred. The low levels found near here, the FUSE researchers conclude, indicate only that much of the deuterium in this neighborhood is in undetectable solid form. "The peak galactic detection levels are likely close to the real total deuterium abundance in the Milky Way, with the rest of it in hiding, not destroyed," said NASA's George Sonneborn, mission project scientist.

If that is the case, scientists have been wrong to believe up to now that at least a third of what was thought to be the original 27 parts-per-million of local deuterium has been destroyed since the Big Bang. In fact, the current level is only about 15 percent below that original level. So, the FUSE findings imply either that significantly less deuterium is being converted to helium and other heavier elements in stars, or, that much more deuterium has rained down onto our galaxy over its lifetime than had been previously been thought. In either case, our models of the evolution of the Milky Way galaxy will have to be revised significantly.

Check out the FUSE web page.

Source: Johns Hopkins University
Pic courtesy T.A. Rector and B.A. Wolpa, NOAO, AURA, and NSF



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.