Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Recent Posts
UK Opens its UFO Files
redewenur
Today at 12:33 AM
Philosophy of Religions--all religions, including,
Revlgking
Yesterday at 04:06 PM
How Reliable are those climate models?????
Revlgking
Yesterday at 03:48 PM
Human Influence on Climate
samwik
Yesterday at 11:50 AM
Does science require reproducible experiments?
redewenur
Yesterday at 10:34 AM
Reinventing the Sacred
Revlgking
Yesterday at 09:11 AM
CFL bulb with a Ionic air cleaner ... great idea
paul
05/15/08 09:24 PM
The platypus genome sequenced
redewenur
05/15/08 11:28 AM
The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
paul
05/15/08 09:34 AM
Biodegradeable oil for use in ground water cooling
paul
05/14/08 08:59 PM
Hot Topics

The Environment

Evolution

Space

Mind/Brain

Electronics

Climate Change


Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones Gone Wild
Homo Superior
The Universe As Magic Roundabout
In Space, No One Can Hear You Say "Doh!"
Bow To Your Insect Overlords!
Bionics
Sex And The Schizoid Factor
Delusions And Mental Illness
We Come In Peace – NOT!
Eeew!
Small Penis Syndrome A Big Problem?
Have You Hugged Your Robot Today?
Down On The Farm - Yields, Nutrients And Soil Quality
Cat Parasite Has Global Ambitions
POP Goes The Planet
The Disappearing Male
Missing Link A Tripping Chimp?
Inorganic Dust Formations Alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2008 News

Rusty's Reading List
Sci Books
Join Rusty Rockets for the lowdown on what you should be reading.
Search
Google

Science a GoGo Web
Archives
2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussions
Features


15 December 1998
Worms And Parsnips Support Concept Of Co-Evolution

The idea of co-evolution is not new, but it is far from universally accepted. In 1964, Paul R. Ehrlich, now president of Stanford University's Center for Conservation Biology, and Peter H. Raven, now director of the Missouri Botanical Garden and botany professor at Washington University in St. Louis, founded the study of co-evolution. They defined it as the process of reciprocal evolutionary change in interacting species.

They noted that plants produce chemicals that are toxic to insects, and that insects produce mechanisms to detoxify many plant defenses. However, while most scientists accept the notion that insects must adapt to their host plants, some have debated whether plants tailor their toxins specifically against insects.

With the help of museum specimens of parsnip plants, including some that predate the webworms' post-1900 entry into the Midwest, University of Illinois entomologists May R. Berenbaum and Arthur R. Zangerl say they have strong evidence for both sides of the adaptation scenario. Their findings were published in the Nov. 10 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Today's webworms and parsnips in Minnesota and in northern and central Illinois have adapted to each other, the scientists report. Webworms feed on the reproductive structures of parsnips, so resistance to the insect is vital to parsnip survival. At each site, levels in the plants of four defensive compounds, called furanocoumarins, match remarkably to the levels of detoxification enzymes in the insects.

"If 30 per cent of the plants have a particular chemical phenotype, then roughly 30 per cent of the insects have the phenotype that permits them to live on those plants," Zangerl said. "You see quite a balancing act. This occurred to a remarkable degree in three of the four populations that we observed."

To strengthen their case, the researchers examined pre-1900 museum specimens kept by the U. of I. Herbarium. They found that the furanocoumarin compound sphondin - produced in high levels in today's parsnips - was produced in low quantities or not at all in the museum specimens. It is sphondin, they found, that the webworms have a hard time metabolizing.

"They have no genetic variation to be able to metabolize it," Berenbaum said. "People have a hard time accepting the idea that plant traits represent a response to insect-caused damage. They assume that insects are minor annoyances to plants, like fleas on a dog, rather than major selective forces. We feel our data say that the evolutionary responses are reciprocal between these interacting species. This work also indicates how quickly plants can respond genetically to insect-caused damage."

Comment On This Story?


BACK

Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop   |   About
The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.