NO BIGBANG
Posted by Johan on Mar 28, 2004 at 12:56
(128.39.136.48)There are indeed many theories supporting Big Bang, and they began developing during the 1950s . Before that a non-expanding universe derived from "GOD" was a valid scientific explanation. Still today several scientist conclude that the Big Bang theory is at best unfounded. The energy og the cosmological background radiaton does not fit in the equation, and the existence of dark matter and "dark energy" is not a valid explanation. I believe that the Big Bang theory will crumble under it's own massive need of assumptions, and a new view of the universe will emerge! The PLASMAUNIVERSE. Check it out.
Follow Ups:
- Re: NO BIGBANG Xed 29/3 17:50 (5)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Johan 01/4 21:27 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Atom 18/4 23:40 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Not Telling 24/4 23:43 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Kathleen 31/3 02:15 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 01/4 08:02 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 07:49 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Pasti 28/3 21:24 (5)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Johan 29/3 09:04 (4)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 20:57 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Johan 01/4 21:08 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 02/4 20:45 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Pasti 29/3 10:01 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 28/3 14:13 (20)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 07:48 (13)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 20:52 (12)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Johan 01/4 21:19 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Atom 18/4 23:49 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 02/4 20:47 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 20:55 (8)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 20:58 (7)
- one more thing Andy 29/3 21:03 (2)
- Re: one more thing DA Morgan 29/3 21:05 (1)
- Re: one more thing Andy 29/3 21:07 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 21:02 (3)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 21:05 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 21:10 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 21:13 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Pasti 28/3 21:31 (5)
- Re: NO BIGBANG John 26/4 16:51 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 20:55 (3)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 21:03 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Andy 29/3 21:09 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 30/3 00:47 (0)