Re: NO BIGBANG
Posted by Johan on Mar 29, 2004 at 09:04
(128.39.136.48)Re: NO BIGBANG (Pasti)
The posted message on "NO BB" is not meant to validate any other solution than the BB, rather to comment the possibility of other explanations. It's people like you Pasti who block the possibility to explore the universe freely. Get that!
A small extract of some of the "proof" as to why the BB theory is wrong: Supporters of the BB theory predicted not many years ago through mathematics that the cosmological background radiaton should have a energyfactor of 50K. This would fit in the image of a universe created from BB. The energy was just after proven and accepted to be only aproxx 3K. This is a pretty large error, and the scientists had no way to explain this. Yet other assumptions was needed to make the equations correct.
Again, I am neither discarding or supporting the theory of the Big Bang, only trying to stir a mind or two.
Johan V. S.
M Sc
Follow Ups:
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 29/3 20:57 (2)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Johan 01/4 21:08 (1)
- Re: NO BIGBANG DA Morgan 02/4 20:45 (0)
- Re: NO BIGBANG Pasti 29/3 10:01 (0)