Re: the universe
Posted by DA Morgan on Feb 09, 2004 at 08:25
(216.162.218.178)Re: the universe (Pasti)
You are correct that they are the two "accepted" possibilities: I think both simplistic and incorrect.
My suspicions is that given a bit of time, if that dimension is meaningful in this context, it all keeps going.
One must always keep in mind that every single thought human's have come up with that is anthropomorphic, start and stop, beginning and end, has proven incorrect.
A bit of bravery is called for. Not enough to be a bunch of lunatics ... but a bit more than the conventional.
Follow Ups:
- Re: the universe Pasti 09/2 21:10 (6)
- Re: the universe DA Morgan 10/2 09:19 (5)
- Re: the universe Pasti 10/2 14:24 (4)
- Re: the universe DA Morgan 11/2 08:48 (3)
- Re: the universe Pasti 11/2 22:20 (2)
- Re: the universe DA Morgan 12/2 15:33 (1)
- Re: the universe Kathleen Eykamp 01/3 03:04 (0)
- Feo: the universe Feo Amante 09/2 10:41 (6)
- Re: Feo: the universe Pasti 09/2 21:13 (4)
- Feo2: the universe Feo Amante 09/2 22:50 (3)
- Re: Feo2: the universe Pasti 10/2 00:16 (2)
- Feo3: the universe Feo Amante 10/2 13:29 (1)
- Re: Feo3: the universe Pasti 10/2 17:24 (0)
- Feo2: the universe Feo Amante 09/2 10:44 (0)