Re: But back to science
Posted by John on Dec 16, 2003 at 06:35
(65.172.199.100)Re: But back to science (DA Morgan)
Quite the nail:
"More fossil localities closer in age to this major event are needed to fully evaluate the competing hypotheses," says Kappelman, "and we are now convinced that the fossils are out there waiting to be found."
Did you actually read the story or just post the first section?
Follow Ups:
- Re: But back to science Amaranth Rose 16/12 13:30 (0)