Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics:
Posted by Perfection on Sep 30, 2003 at 14:37
(65.103.38.249)Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: (Garry W. Denke)
No, I meant lie as dishonest, or utter bull-shit.
And anyways, just because it "looks kinda like teeth" doesn't mean it is. It looks a lot like plenty of other things.
A pen is round and cylindrical, but noone says it was modeled after a phallus.
Follow Ups:
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Garry W. Denke 01/10 17:46 (4)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Perfection 03/10 19:25 (3)
- Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts Garry W. Denke 08/10 01:06 (2)
- Re: Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts Tree 12/10 06:14 (1)
- Re: Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts Connie Conodont 01/11 09:00 (0)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Garry W. Denke 01/10 02:58 (8)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Perfection 03/10 19:29 (7)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Garry W. Denke 04/10 12:22 (6)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Perfection 05/10 00:18 (5)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Garry W. Denke 05/10 09:53 (4)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Perfection 07/10 15:11 (3)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Garry W. Denke 08/10 00:04 (2)
- Re: Stonehenge baby Dental record Forensics: Perfection 16/10 23:57 (1)
- ForteanTimes Geophysical Writeup Garry W. Denke 19/10 07:20 (0)