paradisical union? bs??
Posted by Seung Kim on Oct 17, 2003 at 15:15
(66.91.48.23)A sense of the new in religion is impossible. In its traditional landscape
there is but oppression which is a base form of leadership.. I would have
more or less let my neck out raw for the cut, so I can in fact show ultimate
bravery and all that wonderful shit to aggress..As the progress is in the realization, 'I
see no end..just a lot of toil for a world that will nevertheless be
troubled..' In this consideration is the excuse to move with mind to the
destruction of the things that were built..And time fluctuates economy and
state of the nation until we know that we must build to seek comfort within
this niche of time..The ultimate meaning is not there, although our traumas
hold before us a sense that comes from aesthetic pressure rather than more
reasoned out ones..Cartesian logic would set before us high standards..for
science we press on, to experience the new in a place through it..Science in
religious principle holds only a few liable for tyranny in the grasp of
it..for the most part, we contribute if we choose to and nothing of an
authorship or creation of a school can be sound in a world where the author
has been defeated over and over again..But religion stands for an aggression
in ideas. We try to swallow these stones, until our own arrogance defaults
us back to the notion that he or she has sinned..There are some advents that
can defeat an practicing nihilist due to the relavancy to his life and limb.
If we stand at the edge of town, we are already defeated..so we must merge
into this collective organism, though we stand at the edge of town with
heightened sense in a way that a solution is obvious..by Seung Kim