no such thing
Posted by Kathleen Eykamp on Jul 03, 2003 at 19:24
(211.28.96.43)It frustrates me when science continues to refer to a space with degrees of a lesser atmospheric pressure as a 'vacuum', where a true vacuum simply doesn't exist that we know of - nor a nil nor void, inside this universe. If science is so exacting, a more relevant term should be applied because, in fact, nothing can be 'created' in a true vacuum - unless perhaps by God, Himself, and I suspect it will take death for even scientists to determine this.
For the purposes of experimentation, a measure needs to be used to identify the level of reduction in atmosphere, to give accuracy to any project carried out in same - serving more to delineate the current limitations of scientists creating these spaces, pre-implosion/colapse. Thoughts, anyone?
Kind regards
Kathleen Eykamp
Follow Ups:
- Ark of the Testimony @ Stonehenge Heelstone Garry Denke, Geologist 13/8 02:04 (0)
- Re: no such thing Kathleen Eykamp 04/7 20:35 (1)
- Re: no such thing cougar 07/7 23:26 (0)
- Re: no such thing Pasti 04/7 20:17 (0)
- Re: no such thing Uncle Al 04/7 16:11 (1)
- Re: no such thing Kathleen Eykamp 04/7 21:20 (0)
- Re: no such thing Mike Kremer 04/7 13:40 (2)
- Re: no such thing Kathleen Eykamp 04/7 20:33 (1)
- Re: no such thing Mike Kremer 05/7 08:00 (0)