Re: A Better proof example
Posted by Someone on Mar 28, 2002 at 11:31
(209.47.1.92)Re: A Better proof example (Paul)
The fluid pressure would not be 2000psi in the pipe because there would be a pressure loss due to the orifice at the end of the pipe. The smaller the orifice hole, the higher the pressure in the pipe, but the smaller the force exerted by the fluid escaping the pipe (less fluid mass per sec). The larger the orifice hole, the less the pressure in the pipe due to the fluid escaping from the hole.
In any event, in order to maintain 2000 psi in the pipe, and also rotate the pipe due to the force of fluid escaping (thus creating loss of pressure), you would have to add additional fluid pressure to compensate.
By the way, centripetal force is not going to help increase the pressure that much, compared with the amount of pressure you would need to add to actually overcome inertia and increase the rotational speed of a pipe filled with fluid.
The equations in a first year university physics textbook would tell you a similiar story.
Follow Ups:
- Re: A Better proof example Paul 29/3 08:46 (0)
- Re: A Better proof example Paul 28/3 18:58 (1)
- correction wrong size... Paul 28/3 19:55 (0)
- A simple first grade fallacy Graham Freestone 28/3 15:23 (11)
- Re: not such a simple first grade fallacy Paul 28/3 18:37 (10)
- then its simple addition after that point. Paul 28/3 18:41 (9)
- Re: then its simple addition after that point. Pasti 29/3 11:23 (8)
- Re: then its simple addition after that point. Paul 29/3 12:35 (0)
- Re: then its simple addition after that point. Paul 29/3 12:23 (6)
- Re: yoou are absolutely clueless Pasti 29/3 16:23 (5)
- Re: yoou are absolutely clueless Paul 29/3 17:28 (4)
- Re: yoou are absolutely clueless DA Morgan 29/3 17:55 (1)
- Re: yoou are absolutely clueless Amaranth Rose 30/3 00:48 (0)
- Re: yoou are absolutely clueless Paul 29/3 17:37 (1)
- Re: you are still absolutely clueless Pasti 30/3 01:39 (0)