Re: more careless assertions
Posted by Pasti on Mar 25, 2002 at 16:02
(64.10.121.248)Re: more careless assertions (Paul)
"no thanks , I have my own mind to use."
Then you'd better fire it up and start using it.
"why would I want to take advice from people who believe that there is such a thing as a ZERO volume when no matter how small something is it can still be compressed into 1/2 its volume?"
Why would you want to take advice period!
What is the volume of a point in empty space (say in a UHV chamber at 10^(-14) torr?"and this can happen forever it will only get smaller and its area or volume will never become ZERO."
Not everything in this universe is filled with matter.Learn to deal with abstract concepts.
"you cant see it but its there."
You can't see an atom, but it is there, believe it.
"time travel?"
Well, you are moving forward in time, like it or not.But you would not see the difference between this and time travel.
"when time is just a measurement we use it has no physical properties."
For you maybe.But it is among the fundamental bricks of Sr and GR.
"it cannot be manipulated."No,it cannot be manipulated for the time being.
"you state that we are traveling through time.
NOPE."Yep,we do.Only forward and "at constant rate" if you want.Everything in this world,including the world itself moves in time from past to future.But as I said, you would not understand the difference between what I said and what you just wrote above.
Again, deal with abstract concepts, although this is not one."when your entire foundation is built upon lies from your predesessors.
which you willingly support knowing they are wrong."Oh,boy!New moon already?
"I have a very hard time trying to determine the reasons for this but Im sure there are reasons be they good ones or bad ones."
Nothing better for ignorance than the "conspiracy theory".And we get back to the idea of fighting the windmills!
It seems that you have a very hard time to determine anything,but you know, there is a cure for that.It is called reading,learning and understanding.Oh, and BTW, if you really want to prove me and my "predecessors" wrong,you still must read and understand what they do(did) in order to prove them wrong.And you must understand it even better than they do, for the obvious reasons.
Otherwise, you will acomplish nothing except a higher level of white noise.
Again, it is your choice.