Re: cold fussion realized

Posted by ===mike=== on May 27, 2003 at 11:26
(209.178.164.113)

Re: cold fussion realized (Uncle Al)

Is it not obvious that I am searching for this knowledge, ignorant of all the facts, myself open to suggestion? Or, was I coming off like a jerk spewing some drastic change in philosophy? Oh, but you come alone and set us so straight, dear sir. You have such an ego you fail to even read what is written in sincerity. But thank you none the less for the insights you have given regarding water to steam at 1700 fold.

However, are you saying that an electrical field of positive and negatively charged screens set up in series, in a tube, not touching one another, and that if the screens were platinum that they would cause a dramatic explosion if I strayed a fine mist of water into one end? Or are you saying that there need not even be any electrical charge at all for there to be explosiveness? And are you also saying that this would also become radioactive? (Thus, the poisoning effect?)


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]