continuing a previous argument....

Posted by cougar on Nov 10, 2002 at 15:27
(63.228.205.209)


a-man says: "you have no explanatory mechanism for the rise of that original info in the first place..."

Like most creationists, you're straying from the issue and setting up a straw man that you think you can more easily knock down. We were discussing how evolution proceeds, not how Earth life originated. But even so, what do you think you have proven with your straw man? Don't you know that "absence of evidence" is not the same as "evidence of absence"? The fact that I cannot personally explain the origin of life on Earth does not mean that a natural explanation cannot exist. In other words, you have proven nothing.

And by the way, what's your explanation for the origination of life? That a supreme, intelligent, omniscient being of unknown description and location somehow launched the first life form using some unknown and undescribed mechanism, and further personally directed every speciation event thereafter over the last four billion years? And you call others derogatory names?



Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]