Posted by Andy™ on Nov 14, 2002 at 19:10
(63.68.35.70)
Re: Radiometric Dating Resource List link fix (Eduardo)
Considering for a moment that there are 168 links (not counting the internal jump-to links) on the page referenced by mein frund Couger, the first 6 of which (as far as I clicked. I'm at work and bored, but not THAT bored.) lead to other pages with 10+ links of their own, and the link was posted but 3 short days ago...
Considering all of those factors, assuming for a moment that anyman works 9 hour days, this leaves a short time for relaxation and recreation in the evenings (or maybe the mornings). Also considering that the weekend did not elapse, so monsier anyman didn't have all day Sunday, which most people get off work, to read and research the vast list of links offered...
Considering that as well as the fact that a lecturer (assuming he's truthing about being a lecturer) would have extra duties to perform outside of the normal work hours of the day, also considering that I believe he is also a teacher of some sort, unless my memory is failing far too soon...
Taking into consideration of course the fact that you replied a day after the link was posted, indicating just about proof-positive that you didn't in fact read it to it's completion, but anyman, who's position is contrary to yours, MUST read it to it's completion.
After considering all those factors I'd like to quote A Few Good Men: I want you to with your Harvard mouth extend me (anyman) some f*ing courtesy.
If you expect a rational and worthy responce, don't challenge your opponent to read War and peace and have a responce ready 58 hours later.
I don't agree with anyman's position in the least, but snow-jobs and philabusters are the worst kind of debate tactics.
Re: Radiometric Dating Resource List link fix in anticipation.... 15/11 18:16
(1)