Posted by Paul on Dec 22, 2002 at 23:24
(65.83.190.93)
Re: FREE ENERGY CFPFM 1+1= 2 (Southern Man)
>I designed a centrifuge once that would seperate the oxygen from air to be used in boilers shortly before I was injured , this way less fuel would make the same heat but the idea was shelved or swept under the energy rug.
Yes, it would be nice to hot have to heat all that nitrogen and then spew it up the stack but a centrifuge???? Oh, yes, I forgot, you have a free power source so it wouldn't take any external power to separate the gasses. The rest of us stupid scientists just use preheaters to extract the heat from the flue gas into feedwater. The final temperature of the exhaust gas is in the 150-200 degree range which has recovered almost all the energy with no moving parts.
The centrifuge I designed could have worked off of the exhaust gasses.
or driven inline ( with the steam turbine and generator).
as far as stupid goes I suppose everyone realizes what they are better than others.
name calling is a dead giveaway to ignorance when one cannot understand or comprehend a new idea , they feel threatened for some reason so they lash out with what they have to defend there inteligence, others can easily spot this.
Why do we have to have small cars if we have free energy? With a free energy source we could all drive 36 wheel behemoths.
how true... if you could afford it.
So you put in two spinning in opposite directions.
I see where the anger originates now.
the sun has been shinning on its surface and evaporating that water for quite a while
I really dont think that water vapor is the real problem.
Then you don't have a clue what the earth's temperature would be without all that water in the atmosphere. We would be a frozen barren rock like the moon if it weren't for the sun evaporating all that water from the oceans.
I think you've got that backwards.
without water evaporation the earth would get more heat from the sun.
think of a cloudy day and a sunny day.
granted if there were no more water evaporated there would be no rain=no trees=no atmosphere eventually, then maybe barren and cold as ice after quite a long time.
Again, why eliminate a potent greenhouse gas from the equation simply because you know it is natural and concentrate only on the gasses that will cripple the economies of the developed world by their removal? Why is political correctness more important than science?
will cripple?
and how so?
by stopping the billions moving out of the country?
by allowing american industry to save billions per year on energy cost.
by putting billions per year into the pockets of citizens.
what do citizens do with money? spend it perhaps.
and where do american citizens spend money?
would they spend it in america?
would american buisness benifit from such an influx of ready to spend cash.
as for political correctness and science who can tell the difference.
science like technology is politically controlled.
And I want to thank you for doing your part to save the planet by posting this manure.
your welcome.
Re: FREE ENERGY CFPFM 1+1= 2 Southern Man 27/12 09:03
(0)