Posted by Pasti on Nov 05, 2002 at 17:02
(64.10.124.103)
Re: D.A. Morgan and Physics Wonderland (DA Morgan)
>>And, of course, you would be happy to tell us >>what university you graduated from, your major, >>and provide literature references to back up >>your statements?
My dear ignorant fellow,spare me the status theatrics. My degree, my major are pretty much irrelevant for the discussion.
What is relevant is that of course I can back up my statements,and I can also provide references.
For introduction in special relativity, and general relativity,I suggest you start with J.D. Jackson, Electrodynamics (this would be for special relativity mainly)and for general relativity, I would suggest Wald, General Relativity, or if this is too much, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Gravitation. The latter has a lot of pictures, so maybe you will understand something.
For the Bell theorem, and the Podolski-Einstein Rosenberg paradox, Liboff, Quantum Mechanics.
These are mostly texts for undergrads and grads, so for someone with your(narrow)field of view there should not be any problem.
And if you give me a few days,I can pull out of the library the original Bell paper, and PER paper, and send them to you.Although it would be a waste of paper.
However, when it comes to time "penetration", and dimensions where there is no time, and this type of aberrations,simply by asking me for refs is proof enough of your (lack of)knowledge. Even undergrad courses like Young and Freedman's Physics (ninth edition) contain some elementary theory on special relativity, spacetime, Lorentz frames,etc.
>>Or do you just like making yourself feel good >>in the anonymity provided by the internet
As I said, spare me the theatrics.
Now, if you're up to it, pray come with the references I asked you to provide in my previous posting. Only talking won't do. Evidence my fellow,evidence is all.
Re: D.A. Morgan and Physics Wonderland Bud 06/11 12:06
(0)