Re: Wow squared, pstuart
Posted by bobba on Aug 19, 2002 at 20:25
(208.58.229.68)Re: Wow squared, pstuart (pstuart)
Now consider very long tunnels along side
rivers, let say like the Chunnel, providing
power to local needs hopefully reducing power
plant loads,Hopefully is about all the power you're going to get. Current takes the path of least resistance. The only way to tap the energy is to constrain the water passing through the tube. The water, being smarter than the average environmentalist, will for the most part simply avoid the tube.
What about something more like Dr
Frankenstein, lightning, thousands a hits a day
require probably better capacitance technology
in line with zero resistance wiring.Now all we have to do is warm the atmosphere enough so that lightning storms are both predictable and continious, not to mention coming up with some really inventive step-down transformers. BTW, how much energy does zero resistance require on a continous basis?
These are two but a few job
creating nothing but help to the
economies of the world.Your knowledge of economy is surpassed only by your knowledge of science. When we create these "jobs", how do we create the money the people filling the jobs will no doubt expect?
Follow Ups:
- Re: Wow squared, pstuart pstuart 19/8 21:17 (2)
- Re: Wow squared, pstuart bobbapink 20/8 10:56 (1)
- Re: Wow squared, pstuart Southern Man 21/8 07:45 (0)