Re: It's NOT that funny.
Posted by DA Morgan on Jan 28, 2002 at 14:01
mud18.drizzle.com (216.162.193.33)Re: It's NOT that funny. (Sparrow)
I am highly inclined to think the only joke here is on a guillable public.
What are the chances that people in a wide range of countries and cultures would even have a passing acquaintance wiht Arthur Conan Doyle?
Follow Ups:
- Re: It's NOT that funny. Dale 29/1 09:15 (33)
- That's Enough Amaranth Rose 29/1 10:14 (32)
- Re: That was science Dale 30/1 09:35 (31)
- Re: That was science Sparrow 30/1 12:28 (30)
- Re: That was science Dale 31/1 10:50 (25)
- Re: That was science Shasta 14/2 18:03 (0)
- If my comments "got" to you.... Sparrow 01/2 07:41 (1)
- Re: If my comments "got" to you.... Dale 01/2 08:50 (0)
- Re: That was science mara 31/1 12:59 (21)
- Re: That was science Shasta 14/2 18:05 (0)
- Re: That was science Dale 01/2 09:18 (11)
- Re: That was science Shasta 14/2 18:58 (0)
- Re: That was science mara 08/2 11:28 (9)
- Re: That was science Dale 09/2 10:32 (8)
- Re: That was science mara 12/2 12:45 (2)
- Re: That was science Dale 12/2 18:16 (1)
- Re: That was science Shasta 14/2 19:12 (0)
- Re: That was science Amaranth Rose 10/2 03:21 (4)
- Re: That was science Dale 10/2 11:54 (3)
- Re: That was science Amaranth Rose 10/2 16:10 (2)
- GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Dale 11/2 07:59 (1)
- Re: GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Shasta 14/2 19:09 (0)
- Re: That was[n't] science bobbapink 31/1 13:22 (7)
- Re: That was[n't] science Shasta 14/2 19:14 (0)
- Re: That was[n't] science mara 08/2 11:39 (5)
- Re: That was[n't] science Dale 09/2 10:50 (4)
- Re: That was[n't] science shasta 14/2 19:19 (0)
- Re: That was[n't] science mara 12/2 12:50 (2)
- Re: That was[n't] science Dale 12/2 18:25 (1)
- Re: That was[n't] science Shasta 14/2 19:20 (0)
- Re: That was science DA Morgan 30/1 15:19 (2)
Re: That was meaningless but it made him feel good Dale 31/1 11:07 (1)
- Re: That was meaningless but it made him feel good Shasta 14/2 19:24 (0)
- Re: Yeap John W 30/1 14:51 (0)