Re: ¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿Huh?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿
Posted by anyman on Jun 29, 2002 at 16:14
(61.183.183.40)Re: ¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿Huh?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿ (DA Morgan)
But if one is honest one will acknowledge that religion has had a larger percentage of intentional frauds than science.
i don't know about the percentages (are you going to cite some statistics...for whatever statistics are worth :-) but i do know that both arenas have had large numbers of frauds
but that is consistent with the book and christianity since it notes that we are all corrupt :-)
Follow Ups:
- Re: ¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿Huh?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿ DA Morgan 01/7 13:52 (17)
well... anyman 02/7 02:21 (16)
- Re: well... DA Morgan 02/7 16:09 (15)
and... anyman 06/7 06:51 (2)
- Re: and... DA Morgan 08/7 12:47 (1)
- Re: and... anyman 09/7 10:58 (0)
Re: well... anyman 06/7 06:32 (2)
- Re: well... DA Morgan 08/7 12:43 (1)
- Re: well... anyman 09/7 10:52 (0)
more than 3 or 4... anyman 06/7 05:40 (8)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... DA Morgan 08/7 12:41 (7)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... anyman 09/7 10:40 (6)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... DA Morgan 09/7 11:48 (5)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... DA Morgan 10/7 11:34 (3)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... anyman 10/7 16:23 (2)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... DA Morgan 10/7 18:41 (1)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... anyman 10/7 19:11 (0)
- Re: more than 3 or 4... anyman 10/7 11:24 (0)