Re: assumes facts not in evidence
Posted by DA Morgan on Jun 25, 2002 at 17:21
(156.74.250.7)Re: assumes facts not in evidence (bobbapink)
And you backed up your absolutist statement with what exactly? Flailing arms and squinted eyes?
Oooooh.
Follow Ups:
- I backed my data up with links. do the same. bobbapink 25/6 19:19 (0)