Re: the answer is no

Posted by Southern Man on Jun 19, 2002 at 08:47
(209.102.129.58)

Re: the answer is no (DA Morgan)

In other words you were caught in another stupid statement and now you want to change the subject. Very well. So now you want to say that even if the solar energy input wasn’t balanced by energy out over some arbitrary period, it would be irrelevant because you could be at a rock concert waving a cigarette lighter around and that would overcome any imbalance that might exist. You want to say that solar balance is irrelevant just because humans must be responsible for any changes in the environment. I have no response to such authoritatively stated ignorance.

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]