Re: the answer is no

Posted by Southern Man on Jun 13, 2002 at 08:23
(209.102.128.114)

Re: the answer is no (DA Morgan)

You said that the solar balance was irrelevant. Now you agree that there is no other source of energy that contributes even 10% as much as the sun. Sounds like a small change in the sun would then have at least 10 times as much impact as a similar change in any other source. I wouldn't call that irrelevant.

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:

[ Forum ] [ New Message ]